User agent detail

Instagram 4.2.5 (iPad3,6; iPhone OS 7_0_6; en_US; en) AppleWebKit/420+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-330.php
Instagram App 4.2iOS 7.0unknown AppleiPadTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Instagram App 4.2WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPadTabletyesyes0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 420closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeiOS AppleiPad (4th gen)mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPad 4tabletyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeiPadcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView closeiOS 7.0.6AppleiPad3,6closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 420iOS 7.0.6AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 420iOS AppleiPad (4th gen)tabletyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:37 | by ThaDafinser