User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/601.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/8.0 Safari/601.1 Ubuntu/15.10 (3.16.3-1ubuntu1) Epiphany/3.16.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
GNOME Web 3.16.3Ubuntu 15.10Webkit 601.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 8.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.12701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 8.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Epiphany 3.16.3closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Epiphany 3.16WebKit Ubuntu 15.10desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 8.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Epiphany 3.16.3closeUbuntu 15.10closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Epiphany 3.16.3closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Epiphany 3.16.3WebKit 601.1Linux 15.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
GNOME Web 3.16.3Webkit 601.1Ubuntu 15.10desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 8.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:37 | by ThaDafinser