User agent detail

iBrowser/2.7 Lenovo-A288t_TD/S100 Linux/2.6.35 Android/2.3.5 Release/02.29.2012 Browser/AppleWebkit533.1 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Android 2.3.5 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse closeAndroid desktop-browsercloseclose0.26303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IBrowse WebKit Android 2.3LenovoA288tsmartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
iBrowser 2.7closeAndroid 2.3.5LenovoA288t_TDcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.05101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
iBrowser 2.7WebKit Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
iBrowser 2.7Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.5LenovoA288mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:37 | by ThaDafinser