User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Windows; U; wds 7.10; en-US; NOKIA; Nokia 610) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/3.1.1.343 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia610 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 3.1U2 WinPhone7 7.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeWindows mobile-browseryescloseclose0.24102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 3.1 Windows NokiaNokia 610smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 1.0.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 3.1.1closeWindows Phone 7.10Nokia610closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.13501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 3.1.1.343 Windows Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 3.1Gecko Windows Phone 7.5NokiaLumia 610mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:36 | by ThaDafinser