User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.107 UBrowser/1.0.898.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 1.0Windows 7Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 32.0Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.11401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.107closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.107closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 32.0Blink Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.107closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 32.0.1700closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.107closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.11501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.107WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 1.0Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.107closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 32.0.1700.7closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:36 | by ThaDafinser