User agent detail

Opera/6.03 (Windows 98; U) [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 6.03Windows 98 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 6.03Presto Win98 98Windows DesktopDesktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 6.03closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 6.03closeWindows 98desktop-browsercloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 6.03Presto Windows 98desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 6.03closeWindows 98closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 6.3closeWindows 98 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 6.03closeWindows 98 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 6.3 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 6.03 Windows 98desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 6.03closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:36 | by ThaDafinser