User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.3; MediaPad T1 8.0 Build/HuaweiMediaPad) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.114 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-523.php
Chrome 34.0Android 4.3unknown HuaweiMediaPad T1 8.0Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 34.0Blink Android 4.3HuaweiMediaPad T1 8.0Tabletyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeAndroid 4.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.25703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 34.0Blink Android 4.3HuaweiMediaPad T1 8.0tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeAndroid 4.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 34.0.1847closeAndroid 4.3HuaweiMediaPad T1 8.0closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.07501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.114WebKit 537.36Android 4.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 34Blink Android 4.3HuaweiMediaPad T1tabletyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 34closeAndroid 4.3HuaweiT1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.037 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:36 | by ThaDafinser