User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko Kazehakase/0.5.8 Debian/0.5.8-4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-295.php
Kazehakase 0.5Linux unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Kazehakase 0.5Gecko Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.04601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Kazehakase 0.5.8closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Kazehakase 0.5Gecko Debian 0.5desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Kazehakase 0.5.8closeDebian closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Kazehakase 0.5.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Kazehakase 0.5.8Gecko Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Kazehakase 0.5.8Gecko 1.9.1Debian 0.5.8desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:36 | by ThaDafinser