User agent detail

LGE-MX500_VEZ/1.0 UP.Browser/6.2.3.2 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGMX500 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA LGMX500_VEZMobile Phoneyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LGE-MX500 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.2close LGMX500mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 LGMX500smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close LGMX500closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.2 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 LGMX500 VEZmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LGMX500Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.031 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:34 | by ThaDafinser