User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; c) AppleWebKit/535+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/535.10+ Midori/0.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-midori.yaml
Midori 0.4 Webkit 535desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.0WebKit MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.25102 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Midori 0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.0closeOS X desktop-browsercloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Midori 0.4WebKit Mac desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Midori 0.4closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Midori 0.4closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.10501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Midori 0.4WebKit 535Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.58506 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Midori 0.4Webkit 535 desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 5.0.5closeMac OS X 10.6.8Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:34 | by ThaDafinser