User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.6+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Chromium/23.0.1271.95 Chrome/23.0.1271.95 Safari/537.6+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chromium.yaml
Chromium 23.0.1271.95Windows 8Webkit 537.6desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.95closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 23.0.1271.95closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.24602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 23.0WebKit Windows 8desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.95closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 23.0.1271closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 23.0.1271.95closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.09801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 23.0.1271.95WebKit 537.6Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 23.0.1271.95Webkit 537.6Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.95closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 23.0.1271.64closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:34 | by ThaDafinser