User agent detail

NokiaC1-01.1/2.0 (06.07) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-nokia-series40.yaml
Series40 NokiaC1-01mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.047 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NokiaC1-01 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries40 NokiaC1-01mobile-browseryescloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian NokiaC1-01smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close NokiaC1-01closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia C1-01closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series40 NokiaC1-01mobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close NokiaC1-01Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:34 | by ThaDafinser