User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux mips; Opera TV Store/5477) Presto/2.12.362 Version/12.10 Model/Changhong-MST6328
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Opera 12.10GNU/Linux Presto 2.12.362ChanghongMST6328tv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.10Presto 2.12Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.80closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.10Presto GNU/Linux ChanghongMST6328tv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.10 Model/Changhong-MST6328closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.10closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.10Presto 2.12.362Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.4Presto 2.12.362 televisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.10closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:34 | by ThaDafinser