User agent detail

HbbTV/1.1.1 (;TechnoTrend Goerler/Kathrein;S-855/S-955/UFS-925;3.2.0.25.08;;) CE-HTML/1.0 (
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
TechnoTrend Goerler/KathreinS-855/S-955/UFS-925 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
HbbTV 1.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close media-playercloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
TechnoTrendS-855tv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1close TechnoTrend Goerler/KathreinS-855/S-955/UFS-925closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
TechnoTrendS-855/S-955/UFS-925televisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:34 | by ThaDafinser