User agent detail

MOT-VU30/00.62 UP.Browser/6.2.3.4.c.1.124 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaVU30 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-VU30 00.62closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.4.c.1.124close MotorolaVU30mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 MotorolaVU30smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close MotorolaVU30closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 6.2.3.4.c.1.124 MotorolaMotorola VU30closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.49805 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 MotorolaVU30mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close MotorolaVU30Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:34 | by ThaDafinser