User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Symbian; U; Nokia808 PureView; xx) AppleWebKit/534.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) MiniBrowserMobile/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-minibrowser.yaml
MiniBrowser 4.0Series60 Webkit 534.3Nokia808 PureViewmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.041 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeSymbian OS mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian Nokia808smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 534.3closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia 808close Nokia808closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeSymbian closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 534.3NokiaOS NokiaNokia 808closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
MiniBrowser 4.0Webkit 534.3Series60 Nokia808 PureViewmobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:33 | by ThaDafinser