User agent detail

SonyEricssonP1i/R100 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Symbian OS; 701) Opera 8.65 [ru]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-symbian.yaml
Opera Mobile 8.65UIQ Sony EricssonP1mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 8.65Presto 2.2SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.65closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.65closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.65Presto Symbian OS Sony EricssonP1ifeature phoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8.65close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.65closeSymbian OS SonyEricssonP1icloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.65closeSymbian OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.65 Symbian Sony EricssonSony Ericsson P1icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 8.65 UIQ Sony EricssonP1mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyEricssonP1iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:33 | by ThaDafinser