User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android KeyLimePie; xx; LG-F320L Build/KRS92B) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.2 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-android.yaml
Android Browser Android 4.4Webkit 534.30LGG2mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.2WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.11801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.26003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android LGF320Lsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.2closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 4.2closeAndroid LGF320Lcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.06701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.2WebKit 534.30Android LGLGF320Lcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.4LGG2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:32 | by ThaDafinser