User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; Opera/3.0; Windows 4.10) 3.51 [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-295.php
Opera 3.51WinNT 4.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 3.51 WinNT 4.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 3.0closeWindows 4.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 3.0Presto Windows desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 3.0;close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 3.0closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 3.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.14001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 3.0 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 3.0 Windows 98desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 3.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:31 | by ThaDafinser