User agent detail

MOT-A-C6/00.00 UP.Browser/7.2.7.2.552a (GUI) MMP/2.0 Push/PO UP.Link/6.6.0.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaA-C6 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2 Mobile Phoneyes0.05101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-A-C6 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2.7.2.552aclose Motorolai786/i786wmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2 MotorolaAsmartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 7.2.7close MotorolaA-C6closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2.7.2.552a closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 7.2 MotorolaA-C6mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Motorolai786/i786wFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.04501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:31 | by ThaDafinser