User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; Pt-br; samsung m3200) AppleWebKit/530.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/8.6.0.199/69/352/UCWEB Mobile,SAMSUNG-M3200/M3200JCHJ1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UP.Browser/6.2.3.3.c.1.102 (GUI) MMP/2.0 Untrusted/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Samsungm3200 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.10301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 530.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.6WebKit Samsungm3200smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.6.0close Samsungm3200closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.12101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.6.0.199WebKit 530.13 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2Webkit 530.13 Samsungm3200mobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:31 | by ThaDafinser