User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; ru-ru; ImPAD 9708 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/537.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-563.php
Android 4.0Android 4.2unknown ImpressionImPAD 9708Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.2ImpressionImPAD 9708Tabletyesyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2ImpressionImPAD 9708closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.13401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 537.16Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 537.16Android 4.2.2ImPAD 9708tabletyescloseclose0.08101 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:30 | by ThaDafinser