User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Bada; Opera Mini/6.5/34.1016; U; tr) Presto/2.8.119 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-096.php
Opera Mini 6.5Bada 1.02.2 unknowngeneral Mobile DeviceMobile Deviceyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 6.5Presto 2.2Bada 1.0Mobile Deviceyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 6.5close LGVN270mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 6.5Presto Bada yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 6.5close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 6.5closeBada closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 6.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.044 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 6.5Presto 2.8.119 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 6.5Presto 2.8.119Bada mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 6.5close OperaMini 6Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:29 | by ThaDafinser