User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10) AppleWebKit/600.1.25 (KHTML, like Gecko) iBooks Author/652
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
iBooks Author 0.0MacOSX 10.10unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
iBooks Author WebKit MacOSX 10.10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 600.1.25closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeOS X 10.10desktop-browsercloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mac 10.10desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeOS X 10.10closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
AppleMail 600.1.25closeMac OS X 10.10closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeOS X 10.10closecloseclosecloseclose0.08701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 600.1.25Mac OS X 10.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 600.1.25OS X Yosemite 10.10desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:28 | by ThaDafinser