User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux i686; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.114 Safari/537.36 SRAF/3.0 HbbTV/1.1.1 (+DRM+TRICKMODE; SERAPHIC; TV101; sw-v1.0; hw-v1.0) CE-HTML/1.0 FXM-U2FsdGVkX1+tH+IvjK4AyJIfuJUAyORg8ptl86EQiyLy7LytAiEgU3mKjwgF90uz-END
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/other.yaml
Blink 537.36SeraphicTV101television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 30.0Blink Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.16402 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 30.0Blink GNU/Linux LGGLOBAL PLAT3tv0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux SERAPHICTV101closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.114WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Seraphic Sraf 3.0Blink televisioncloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:28 | by ThaDafinser