User agent detail

[FBAN/FB4A;FBAV/4.0.0.26.3;FBBV/907084;FBDM/{density=2.0,width=768,height=1024};FBLC/de_DE;FBCR/o2 - de;FBPN/com.facebook.katana;FBDV/LG-P895;FBSV/4.0.4;FBOP/1;FBCA/armeabi-v7a:armeabi;]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGP895 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Facebook App WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.052 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Facebook close LGP895;FBSVmobile-browseryescloseclose0.20602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Facebook 4.0 LGP895smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Facebook 4.0.0close LGP895closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
LGLGP895closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Facebook LGP895;FBSVmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:28 | by ThaDafinser