User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.5; En-US; IBall Andi3e Build/GRJ90) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, Like Gecko) UCBrowser/9.0.1.275 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
iBallAndi 3e Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.0U3 Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.08301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 9.0.1.275closeAndroid 2.3.5GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.0WebKit Android 2.3iBallAndi3etabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.0.1closeAndroid 2.3.5iBallAndi 3ecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.07601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.0.1.275WebKit 534.31Android 2.3.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.0Webkit 534.31Android 2.3.5iBallAndi 3emobile:smartyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:28 | by ThaDafinser