User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; xx; samsung-gt-e2202) AppleWebKit/530.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/8.5.0.185/83/352/UCWEB Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
UC Browser 8.5 Gecko SamsungMetromobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.15302 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 530.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari close GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.5WebKit Samsunggt-e2202smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.5.0close Samsunggt-e2202closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.5.0.185WebKit 530.13 SamsungMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.5Gecko SamsungMetromobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:27 | by ThaDafinser