User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (TweetmemeBot/4.0; +http://datasift.com/bot.html) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/31.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-497.php
yesTweetmemeBotBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesTweetmemeBotBot/Crawler0.13401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 31.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox close desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesTweetmeme BotCrawler0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 31.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesTweetmemeBotclose0.019 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 31.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 31.0Gecko 20100101 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 31.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:26 | by ThaDafinser