User agent detail

MOZILLA50 (SYMBIANOS92 U SERIES60/31 SAMSUNG/SGH-I458B/
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-I458B Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries60 31Samsungi458mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 31 Symbian OS Series 60 31SamsungSGH-I458Bsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungSGH-I458Bcloseclosecloseclose0.029 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 closeSYMBIANOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.05801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator Symbian Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series60 31Samsungi458mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:26 | by ThaDafinser