User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux zvav; U; xx) Presto/2.8.119 Version/10.54
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Mini Presto 2.8.119mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 10.54Presto 2.2Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.54closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 10.54closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.17602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 10.54Presto GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.54closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 10.54closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 10.54closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.54Presto 2.8.119Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini Presto 2.8.119 mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.54closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 10.00closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:26 | by ThaDafinser