User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; CareerBot/1.1; +http://www.career-x.de/bot.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-317.php
yesCareerBotBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesCareerBotBot/Crawler0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesCareerBot/1.1close0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesCareerBotCrawler0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesCareerBotclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
CareerBot Search Crawler 1.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.07601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:25 | by ThaDafinser