User agent detail

SIE-A52/04 UP.Browser/5.0.3.3 (GUI)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SiemensA52 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 5.0 Mobile Phoneyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SIE-A52 04closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 5.0.3.3close SiemensA52mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 5.0 SiemensA52smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 5.0.3close SiemensA52closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 5.0.3.3 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 5.0 SiemensA52mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SiemensA52Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:25 | by ThaDafinser