User agent detail

Dalvik/1.6.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.4; QS0815C Build/IMM76I)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Android Browser Android 4.0.4WebKit 3QQS0815Ctablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dalvik 1.6WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Dalvik 1.6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.0.43QQoo! Q-Pad QS0815Cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.24102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.03QQS0815Ctabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.4closeAndroid 4.0.4QS0815Ccloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 4.0.43QQoo! Q-Pad QS0815Ctabletyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:24 | by ThaDafinser