User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; AOL 9.7; AOLBuild 4343.1028; Windows NT 5.1; WOW64; Trident/7.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
IE 11.0WinXP 5.17.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 11.0Trident 7.0WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.055 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
AOL Explorer 9.7closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident Windows XPdesktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
AOL 9.7.4343closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
AOL 9.7closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.07801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
AOL Desktop 9.7Trident 7.0Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:24 | by ThaDafinser