User agent detail

HbbTV/1.1.1 (+PVR;Humax;iCord HD+;1.01.17;1.0)CE-HTML/1.0 ANTGalio/3.1.1.23.04
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
ANTGalio 3.1.1.23.04 HumaxiCord HD+tv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
HbbTV 1.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
ANT Galio 3.1.1.23.04close media-playercloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
ANTGalio 3.1 HumaxiCord HD+tv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1close HumaxiCord HD+closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
ANT Galio 3.1.1 HumaxiCord HD+ Digital Receivertelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:23 | by ThaDafinser