User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; RMD-753 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.89 Safari/537.36 OPR/27.0.1698.89115
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-563.php
Opera Mobile 27.0Android 4.4unknown RitmixRMD-753Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 27.0Blink Android 4.4RitmixRMD-753Tabletyesyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 27.0.1698.89115closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 27.0.1698.89115closeAndroid 4.4.2GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.28703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 27.0Blink Android 4.4yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 27.0.1698.89115closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 27.0.1698closeAndroid 4.4.2RMD-753closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 27.0.1698.89115WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 27.0Blink Android 4.4.2RMD-753tabletyescloseclose0.07701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 27.0.1698.89115closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Tabletyesyescloseclose0.038 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:23 | by ThaDafinser