User agent detail

MQQBrowser/39 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone 4S; CPU iPhone OS 6_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/10A523 Safari/7534.48.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
QQ Browser Mobile 39 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
QQbrowser WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7534.48.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser 39closeiOS 6.0.1SonyEricssonST25imobile-browseryescloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 39WebKit iOS 6.0AppleiPhone 4Ssmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeiOS 6.0.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 39closeiOS 6.0.1closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 6.0.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 39WebKit 536.26iOS 6.0.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 3.9Webkit 536.26iOS 6.0.1AppleiPhone 4Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:23 | by ThaDafinser