User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/6.0.472.63 Safari/534.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-297.php
Chrome 6.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 6.0WebKit Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 6.0.472.63closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 6.0.472.63closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 6.0WebKit Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 6.0.472.63closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 6.0.472closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 6.0.472.63closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.13401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 6.0.472.63WebKit 534.3Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 6Webkit 534.3Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 6.0.472.63closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 6.0.472.63closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:22 | by ThaDafinser