User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9) AppleWebKit/537.26.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.1 Safari/537.26.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-safari.yaml
Safari 6.1OS X Mavericks 10.9Webkit 537.26.4desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 6.1WebKit MacOSX 10.9AppleMacintoshDesktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 6.1closeOS X 10.9desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 6.1WebKit Mac 10.9desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 6.1closeOS X 10.9closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 6.1closeMac OS X 10.9closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 6.1closeOS X 10.9closecloseclosecloseclose0.08101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 6.1WebKit 537.26.4Mac OS X 10.9closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.46305 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 6.1Webkit 537.26.4OS X Mavericks 10.9desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 6.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 6.0.5closeMac OS X 10.7.5Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:22 | by ThaDafinser