User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; Pt-BR; samsung b5702) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.2.0.311 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Samsungb5702 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.2U2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.2 Samsungb5702smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.2.0close Samsungb5702closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.2.0.311 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.2Gecko Samsungb5702mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:21 | by ThaDafinser