User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows 2000) Opera 6.0 [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Opera 6.0Windows 2000Presto desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 5.0Trident Win32 Windows DesktopDesktop0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 6.0closeWindows 2000desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 6.0Presto Windows 2000desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 6.0closeWindows 2000 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 6.0 Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 6.0 Windows 2000desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:21 | by ThaDafinser