User agent detail

rogerbot/1.0 (http://www.seomoz.org/dp/rogerbot, rogerbot-crawler@seomoz.org)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/crawler.yaml
yesSeoMoz rogerbot Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesRogerbotBot/Crawler0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
rogerbot 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesrogerbot/1.0close0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesRogerbotCrawler0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesrogerbotclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesSeoMoz rogerbotclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:21 | by ThaDafinser