User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0(YAdSDK; 1.9.2.1); (Linux; U; Android 4.0.3; SAMSUNG GT-I9100 Build/ICE_CREAM_SANDWICH_MR1);
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-I9100 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3SamsungGalaxy S IImobile-browseryescloseclose0.25903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0SamsungGALAXY S IIsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.3closeAndroid 4.0.3SamsungGT-I9100closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android 4.0.3SamsungGalaxy S IIcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 4.0.3SamsungGalaxy S IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.029 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android App 4.0closeAndroid 4.0SamsungGT-I9100Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:21 | by ThaDafinser