User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.2 Version/1.0 Safari/532.2 Pixi/1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PalmPixi Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 1.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 1.0WebKit GNU/Linux PalmPixi 1.1smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 1.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 1.0closeLinux PalmPixicloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 1.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.10301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 532.2Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 532.2Linux closeclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 1.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:21 | by ThaDafinser