User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; I-mobile I-STYLE 7.2 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, Like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.92 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
imobileI-STYLE 7.2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 30.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.92closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 30.0.1599.92closeAndroid 4.1.2GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 30.0Blink Android 4.1i-mobilei-Style 7.2smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.92closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 30.0.1599closeAndroid 4.1.2imobileI-STYLE 7.2closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.15501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.92WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 30Blink Android 4.1.2i-Mobilei-Style 7.2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.043 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.92closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.047 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:21 | by ThaDafinser