User agent detail

SonyEricssonW980i/R1X Browser/SEMC-Browser/4.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonW980i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SEMC Browser JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonW980i R1Xcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
SEMC Browser 4.1closeJVM SonyEricssonW980mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SEMC-Browser 4.1 Sony EricssonW980ifeature phoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
SEMC-Browser 4.1close SonyEricssonW980icloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
SEMC-Browser 4.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sony EricssonSony Ericsson W980icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SEMC Browser 4.1 Sony EricssonW980imobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SonyEricssonW980Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:20 | by ThaDafinser