User agent detail

MQQBrowser/Mini2.2 (Nokia5230/50.0.001/sw_platform=S60;sw_platform_version=5.0;java_build_version=1.4.43)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Symbian OS Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MQQBrowser Mini2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser Mini2.2close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian OS Series 60 Nokia5230smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 50.0.001/closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mini 2.2closeSymbian OS Nokia5230closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 5230closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser Mini 2.2 Series60 Nokia5230mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:20 | by ThaDafinser