User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/531.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/3.0.193.2 Safari/531.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chrome.yaml
Chrome Dev 3.0.193.2Windows VistaWebkit 531.3desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 3.0WebKit WinVista 6.0Desktop0.10001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 3.0.193.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 3.0.193.2closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 3.0WebKit Windows Vistadesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 3.0.193.2closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 3.0.193closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 3.0.193.2closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.06901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 3.0.193.2WebKit 531.3Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 3.0.193.2Webkit 531.3Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 3.0.193.2closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 3.0.193.2closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:19 | by ThaDafinser