User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; NLCrawler/2.0.15; Linux 2.6.3-7; i686; en_US)KHTML/3.4.89 (like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
NLCrawler 2.0.15 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesNorthern Light Web SearchBot/Crawler0.06801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesNLCrawlerCrawler0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesNLCrawlerclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:34:18 | by ThaDafinser